Blog   |   E-Newsletter   |   Donate
EPFP Alumni Blog
Blog Home All Blogs
Welcome to the EPFP Alumni Blog! Here we highlight the work of EPFP alumni around the country by featuring guest blog posts about our three pillars: Policy, Leadership, and Networking. For more information or to report abuse of this feature, please contact the EPFP national program staff at epfp@iel.org.

Submit a post to the alumni blog.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

Top tags: alumni  leadership  civil rights  cross-boundary leader  equity  policy  career  community college  data  disability  education  justice  leader  networking  parents  principal  public service  research  SEL  unity  virginia  washington dc  water safety  WIE 

Cross-Boundary Leader: Robert Feirsen

Posted By National Coordinator, Tuesday, August 14, 2018
Updated: Monday, August 13, 2018

Robert Feirsen (NY EPFP '13-14)

DIRECTOR, SCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | NYIT 

Career Path & Education Policy
Robert Feirsen is the Director of the School of Leadership and Technology Program at NYIT. He provides an academic background with a focus on technology for aspiring school leaders at many levels. The program is unique in the organic approach to technology and its use as a strategic mechanism for conducting the work of schools.  Feirsen previously served as Superintendent of Garden City (N.Y.) Public Schools for 12 years, and has administrative leadership experience at the deputy superintendent, and school principal levels.


Education Philosophy
Throughout my career, I had overseen many aspects of the education process. These experiences have allowed me to analyze and identify barriers to success in the education process. Funding is at the forefront of the education policy matter. We have traditionally underfunded public state education, and we have not figured out how to balance the Equity=Excellence equation. In the future, I hope to see a country that is able to actualize and make a commitment the vision of equity with excellence in education nationally.

Gaps in understanding from the high school to college level pose a threat to the success of both institutions. Although the two institutions act as a continuum, there are tremendous gaps in understanding of what each party does. Not only do the two institutions not share the same vocabulary, their understanding of the policies and best practice is vastly different. Good conversation and collaboration between each institution will help us reduce these barriers and result in positive change for all. 


We have made strides in the advancement of neuropsychology and information about how people learn, remember, and apply knowledge. But we have not mastered implications of these understandings at the daily instructional level.  The most critical questions in education are: How can we be sure that students learn, and what assessment tools are used for measuring what they learn? As educators, we are fulfilling our goal if we can ensure that students can apply what they are learning. 


EPFP Experience and Value
The EPFP experience was a pivotal moment in my career. As a school leader, the press of day-to-day events often prevented me from looking at the big picture issues in education policy, but EPFP widened my lens.  EPFP enabled me to step back and assess the overarching education climate and fine tune my approach. 

Upon completion of the program, I was able to bring the knowledge I gained from EPFP to my job. Specifically, during a conversation with the Board of Education I was able to give recommendations of best practices I learned at EPFP for addressing policy. As a result, we created a legislative affairs committee where we could work collaboratively with other districts that felt similar education needs. Overall, the knowledge I gained from EPFP has been funneled upward and has positively impacted the scope of the work of the Board of Education, to the benefit of my staff and student community. 

Networking and Leadership 
Networking is a great part of the program, and I am grateful for the experience and the connections I made during the Fellowship. Sharing knowledge is one of the most important parts of the work I do. When I work with great people, I am privileged to know that I can teach them something and that someday they will be able to apply what they learned in their careers. EPFP has also empowered me to reflect on my leadership style and become a leader who is strong yet gracious. Our work is people-centered and when dealing with people it’s important to be helpful, compassionate, and empathetic. The people we serve are not data points. Each person we serve has a story and journey and our goal is to add quality experiences to their lives. I found that there was much value in the program. The information provided, connections made, and speakers were most significant to my experience. EPFP has illuminated that nobody does anything alone. We rely on other people, and that’s a great thing because the more voices we can get into the mix, the stronger and better our decisions will be.

 

Tags:  alumni 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

From Policy Project to Statewide Task Force Leader

Posted By Sarah McCann, Monday, January 8, 2018
Updated: Wednesday, December 20, 2017

 Jenna Masone

CT EPFP 16-17

Principal, Wolfpit Elementary School & Legislative Task Force Co-Chair

As I sat in the EPFP seminar one fall evening in 2016, the Connecticut Chapter Facilitator, Leslie Abbatiello, relayed a story about a determined citizen who worked for seven years to pass legislation designating a state polka song.  It struck me as a triumphant example of the potential impact one citizen could have, and inspired me to consider what I might be able to accomplish to positively impact my community.  

As part of the ten month program, fellows were charged with completing a project.  Left intentionally vague for our group of accomplished professionals, there were no parameters, deadlines, or grades.  What was presented was a simple invitation to engage in public service as related to education.  Diverse perspectives and areas of interest led all of us in different directions.  As the Principal of Wolfpit Elementary School in Norwalk and an avid swimmer most of my life, I was interested in public policy as related to water safety awareness.  Preliminary research revealed the rates of unintentional drowning for children ages birth to eighteen have remained relatively stagnant both nationally and locally for decades.  Drowning continues to be a leading cause of death in children.  Of note is the disproportionate representation of African American and Hispanic children that comprise two-thirds of all deaths.  In addition, ninety percent of deaths of children on the autism spectrum are due to unintentional drowning.  

There has been relatively little legislative response or public policy in Connecticut pertaining to the general issue of water safety awareness.  Given the number of preventable deaths and their profound impact on families, I was inspired to take action.  Though I had never heard of a legislative policy brief before EPFP, a quick internet search provided several templates and in two snow days’ time it was written.  I connected with the Connecticut Commission on Women, Children, and Seniors.  The Executive Director read the policy brief and was enthusiastic about raising awareness at the state level.  As a non-partisan arm of the general assembly, the commission arranged for a round table discussion and press conference with legislators from both sides of the aisle.  I connected with several family foundations and state agencies, and invited additional participants.  We followed with a press conference to announce the Governor’s declaration of May as Water Safety Month across the state.  

The participants’ interest in and commitment to the issue at the round table discussion was clear and broad-based. As a result, the Commission used its statutory capacity to create the Connecticut Commission on Women, Children, and Seniors Water Safety Awareness Legislative Task Force.  At the annual board meeting, I was appointed Co-Chair of the Task Force and charged with appointing members, developing a draft set of deliverable objectives, developing a schedule of meetings, and producing a year end report.  The Task Force is comprised of individuals representing the House, the Senate, the Department of Education, the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, the Office of Early Childhood, the Department of Public Health, the Department of Public Safety, the YMCA, the American Red Cross, the American Association of Pediatrics, the Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Stew Leonard III Children's Charities, and the Zac Foundation.    

The Task Force serves as a forum for water safety awareness experts and legislators to exchange their expertise, and to take meaningful action on behalf of children.  The members’ collective efforts are evolving into a statewide response with the goal of reducing the number of unintentional drownings and hospitalizations.  The path is forged and the process has begun.  What started as a fleeting idea evolved into public action in less than one year.  The EPFP experience provided the foundation, the context, and the tools for me to initiate what I hope to have a profound, positive impact on children and families.

Tags:  alumni  leader  principal  public service  water safety 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Cross-Boundary Leader: Eve Odiorne Sullivan (MA EPFP '12-13)

Posted By Sarah McCann, Monday, November 13, 2017
Updated: Thursday, October 19, 2017

Eve Sullivan is the Founder and Executive Director of Parents Forum and author of Where the Heart Listens

 

Parents Forum and Parent Peer Support

I founded Parents Forum with the purpose of raising individuals’ emotional awareness and improving their communications skills. I believe that our efforts to develop positive ways of expressing feelings and managing our internal and interpersonal conflicts are the core of good parenting and healthy family life.

 

We don't receive a lot of solid preparation or orientation for being a parent. There’s preparation for childbirth, which happens whether you are prepared or not. Once you have the baby, a lot of parenting training has been, and still is, focused on practical skills: what you need to know how to do. Now, though, there is growing emphasis on social and emotional learning (SEL) in a child’s early development and how parents’ support for this enhances children’s intellectual achievement. It is great that SEL aspects of early childhood development are in the spotlight, but the focus is still on the child and on how parents can help their children.

 

The focus needs to shift toward parents. When parents are encouraged to seek help for themselves they can make positive changes that cascade to benefit the child and other family members.

 

Parents Forum grew out of my experiences getting help at a time when my kids were going through some typical adolescent experiences, that is, misbehaving! Some of it was pretty extreme, and I am thankful for the therapeutic community that helped my family, now two decades ago. I learned so much from the experience that I wanted to take it, teach it and now give it away. The key question is “How can one parent help another without putting that parent down?” I want Parents Forum resources and workshops to be accessible and available to other parents, but it’s a hard sell because raising children is so personal.

 

Cross-Boundary Leadership

My vision is, ultimately, cross-sector: I believe that all schools, faith communities and workplaces -- and youth sports organizations, too -- should routinely offer courses for parents. There should be classes for parents at every important stage that their child goes through and at every life transition they experience themselves. Both peer-led and professionally led programs can teach parents about developmental stages and age-appropriate expectations for their children’s behavior. Being an effective parent for a teenager is different from being an effective parent for a kindergartener, after all.

 

A cross-boundary leader needs to be willing to talk to and reach out to all kinds of people, and I like doing that. One example might be the prison workshops Parents Forum gave for several years. Of the men in the program, at MCI-Norfolk in Massachusetts, most had lost direct contact with their children, but they still carried their family experiences in their hearts. They welcomed the opportunity that we offered to share and, to some extent, heal their past suffering.

 

If we want to effectively access resources or share our own, we have to be willing to talk to all kinds of people. Be willing to strike up a conversation. I like the retail aspect of the work I do, helping just one parent in the moment, and I believe this is important. I learn something from each interaction about how – and sometimes about how not – to help someone else.

 

Parents’ needs change, and their skills need to change as well along the way. We need to normalize participation in such programs, so that parents say “Well, wait a minute, I need an orientation on how to be and what to do as a parent of a pre-teen or teen,” etc. Parenting education is still in its early stages, but we need to normalize both provision of and participation in parenting education programs.

 

Leadership Lessons Learned

Keep on keeping on and don’t be afraid to take that one next step. The one after will become apparent. Be ready to ask for help and to correct course when needed. I certainly did not anticipate, at the start, Parents Forum’s 25th anniversary this year. While we have only a few dollars in the bank -- I thought we would be bigger by now -- I’m very happy with the progress we have made and recognition we have achieved.

 

Developments in the past months have been significant for Parents Forum. We have a pilot group going in Winthrop and are working with pediatricians and with the superintendent of schools. I see that we need to aim higher in seeking community involvement. As important as grassroots work is, community leaders in various sectors need to be involved in advocacy for parenting education.

 

EPFP Experience and Value

EPFP was important for me professionally because I hadn’t done any graduate study since my Harvard MAT at the beginning of my teaching career. The program gave me a chance to re-engage with educators. I have done other programs and had teaching experiences that were not so rewarding as EPFP. A main advantage was being in a cohort of people from different fields. Our group included a nutritionist, principals, and an elected school committee member, as well as classroom teachers. EPFP gave me a welcome opportunity to connect or re-connect with people in the larger school community. To be in a cohort with other teachers was very useful for my professional goals as a parenting educator and a writer.

 

EPFP is relevant today because it is both accessible and focused. The program format gave me a chance to talk with a diverse group of people. Although I am ‘a one-issue candidate’ and was always beating the drum for parent engagement, I think that the others in the group appreciated the perspectives I brought to our discussions.

 

Parenting education is relatively new as a profession: teachers and administrators seldom hear from people in this field. I had the sense from my EPFP cohort that they welcomed the chance to step back from their daily experiences and connect about something real. What is more basic to the success of our common educational endeavors than students’ family experiences? Parents are the people who prepare young people for school and for life. When parents do a good job at home, teachers have a much greater chance of success in the classroom.

 

Additional Resources by Eve Sullivan

 Attached Thumbnails:

Tags:  alumni  parents  SEL 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Cross-Boundary Leader: Ellie Wilson (MN EPFP '13-14)

Posted By Sarah McCann, Monday, October 9, 2017
Updated: Wednesday, September 27, 2017

Ellie Wilson is an Education Specialist and Research Coordinator at the Institute on Community Integration located in the University of Minnesota. In this role she works on policy and program initiatives that support people with disabilities. She previously served as the Director of Education for the Autism Society of Minnesota, a state-based nonprofit organization committed to education, support, and advocacy designed to enhance the lives of those affected by autism from birth through retirement. She oversaw programming, training, and general education for individuals with special needs, their families, and community members. Wilson has more than ten years of experience working with children with special needs in various settings.

 

Disability and Quality of Services

At the Institute on Community Integration we’re thinking about the quality of life and therefore the quality of services that people receive in the community. Within ICI, the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Home and Community Based Services Outcome Measurement (RRTC-OM) focuses on how we think about the quality of services that are provided to people with disabilities, in their homes and in their work places. Many of these services are funded by government dollars, so there is a lot of public interest in the quality of their life. Past measures tended to focus on money spent on services, staffing ratio, and the movement of people from institutions to the community. It has become increasingly important to demonstrate the effectiveness of the services for persons with disabilities. You do think about personal outcomes, but the other part of quality is what happens in the aggregate and how we look at the quality of systems. There are a lot of issues that we talk about in disability policy that exactly mirror issues that we addressed in EPFP. For example, equity, policy transparency, and allocation of services. At ICI we talk a lot about system performance, such as funding and how we use data and data management to support policy.

RRTC-OM is funded by the National Institute for Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitative Research. Over the next five years the center’s job is to think about how we as a broad community define quality of life and then how we measure it. Even though I live in Minnesota and think about local issues, the center works nationally. Measuring quality is an interesting field that was new to me, but ties to my EPFP experience.

I jumped from a small but well-respected nonprofit organization to ICI. I loved that job and I continue to support their work, but I couldn’t turn down this opportunity to work with different leaders in the field of disability policy – whether that’s education, legal, human rights, or health policy. I’m still at the beginning of my career, so to work with these colleagues and develop a national network means a lot. EPFP had that same interdisciplinary and national lens so I think about it all the time.  

 

EPFP Experience

I came into EPFP because of another alum who went through the Minnesota program a few years before me. She described the program as being a place to surround yourself with intellectual conversation with well-rounded individuals. I felt that being involved in this type of group would inform the type of impact I wanted to make on the policy and communities I work with. It was a privilege to sit around a table with people who have such thoughtful perspectives and intelligence to contribute to the conversation.

What is so valuable about the EPFP process is that even though the core and fundamental ideas of the program were in education policies (which is important and tied to disability policy), when we were having our sessions in MN and in DC, we didn’t only approach a single policy but an approach to highly networked interdisciplinary collaborative efforts to all types of policy change. The natural effect is that even as you work in different areas, you can apply those experiences and lessons very broadly and I think that is unique to the professional programs out there.

Networking was also a big part of my EPFP experience. The Minnesota coordinators do an excellent job of connecting Fellows to people with all kinds of perspectives and careers, and it’s really inspiring to recognize all of those important players in your field. I come to DC all the time and I feel there are EPFP graduates everywhere.

 

Leadership Lessons Learned

The deeper I get into this work, the more I realize that leadership doesn’t happen in a vacuum. Instead, it’s more about effective coordination of the teams around you. I also think networking is one of the most important skills of a good leader. Successful leaders need to be inclined toward connecting and cooperating with as many potential or realized stakeholders as possible. While working among multiple stakeholders can also pose its own challenges, it leads to slow and steady progress and sustainability.

The most important lesson is the importance of laying groundwork early for strong relationships with those that could be allies in policy improvement and reform. Having the strong relationships early will make it a lot easier to try to plan out partnerships in the future. Sometimes you realize part way into a project or research that you can bring on a partner that would be effective or engage a new stakeholder. One thing I love about ICI is they’ve done a great job of creating a national advisory team before the research even began. It is the smartest way to do it, I can’t imagine doing it another way.

 

Cross-Boundary Leadership and Challenges

There is no single context in which policy is important to individuals and families with autism or other disabilities; they must navigate through housing, law enforcement, education, and employment sectors as does everyone. This naturally makes my work cross-boundary because we’re always working in so many contexts. The disability sector is unique because it crosses both disciplinary and partisan lines, which allows us the opportunity to engage people from across all spectrums who have a stake in this work.

The more work that I do advocating for local, state, and federal policy, one thing has become crystal clear to me. It is important and necessary to look at policy from an interdisciplinary, cross-leadership perspective. There is no way the hard work people do can advance to policy improvement and reform without the cooperation of folks from all types of fields. Even the work I am doing now, I am regularly in contact with all kinds of supporters who come from all kinds of fields. It is a challenge and a privilege to be able to work across that many disciplines with the same policy goal, but it is imperative to our success for anything we want to promote as our research progresses.

One of the biggest challenges is the juggling that comes with interdisciplinary cooperation and collaboration. Though that’s the way to succeed it also sometimes means that you have to consider the priorities and needs of people who are coming from different policy angles – for example, budgets, unifying message, infrastructure concerns. It can be difficult to create something that captures the priorities across all of those disciplines. But when you can do it effectively and collaboratively, even in the toughest political climate, you have a shot at making positive change. 

Tags:  alumni  disability  leadership  research 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

An EPFP Coordinator's Reflection: Civil Rights Bus Tour Themes

Posted By Sarah McCann, Wednesday, August 9, 2017

Written by MA EPFP Coordinator Laura Dziorny, based on her participation in the Civil Rights Bus Tour in 2016.
To attend the EPFP Alumni Bus Tour on January 21-24, 2018, learn more and register here: http://epfp.iel.org/page/civilrightstour

As a co-coordinator of the Massachusetts Education Policy Fellowship Program for the past few years, I’ve been interested in thinking more critically about how we can integrate a focus on civil rights into our program. As a result—and because of my deep interest in experiencing first-hand historical sites I had only read about—I was eager to participate in the Civil Rights Bus Tour last year. Going into the experience, I felt myself quite far removed (by age, race, and geography) from the key moments that unfolded during the civil rights movement. But one of the major takeaways for me was to realize that there are no distant observers when it comes to the movement for civil rights. It is not just for heroes, for other communities, or merely a part of our history. We all have a role to play.

            For me, one major theme of the tour was courage. Namely, I realized that the civil rights movement was made of ordinary people. This isn’t to say that the people involved don’t deserve our admiration and respect. Of course they do. But when we label people as “heroes” we shouldn’t forget that these were people just like us. In particular, two memories from the tour have stuck with me because of the way they demonstrate the courage of those involved with the movement.

            On the first day of our tour, we heard from a woman named Jewel at the Mt. Zion United Methodist Church in Philadelphia, Mississippi. Her mother and brother were brutally beaten by Klansmen as they left a church meeting during the summer of 1964, the same summer that Mickey Schwerner, James Chaney, and Andrew Goodman were killed in Philadelphia for their involvement in efforts to register black voters. Hearing Jewel talk about the Klan activity and the constant threat of violence that black residents faced, it was impossible not to reflect on the deep, abiding, resilient spirit and courage of Jewel, her family, and so many others like them. Sometimes the most courageous thing is daring to live your life the way you want to. I was so impressed by the quiet courage of all those who lived under the threat of violence during these fraught times, when just carrying out basic day-to-day tasks like going to school or church was a dangerous act.

            Another striking moment—for me and the whole group—came as we toured the Dexter Avenue Parsonage, where Martin Luther King lived with his young family when he was pastor of the Dexter Ave. Church in Montgomery from 1954-1960. The contents of the parsonage are well-preserved, reflecting the daily life of a family in the 1950s. It’s incredible to think that as you walk next to the couch and coffee table, the beds and dressers, that such a great hero of our history lived and worked here. We have a tendency to deify King and other leaders of the movement, to put them on a pedestal. The truth is that he was a human who faced doubts and fear and crises of confidence, who ate at that kitchen table and slept in that bed. He became one of our heroes by rising to the occasion in an extraordinary moment in time, but it’s important to remember that any of us could call upon the same sources of courage in our lives if we choose.

            A second major theme I took away from my experience is the incredible power of community—that is, people pulling together in support of a larger movement. A prime example came at the Rosa Parks Library and Museum, when we learned about the Montgomery bus boycott that lasted 382 days from 1955-56. We saw pictures and learned about the measures that community members took to continue on with their lives despite the disruption, including organizing covert carpool pick-up points. It’s incredible to think about the unity and sense of purpose that inspired those participating in the boycott, and to reflect on how they pulled together and used their creativity to reinforce community bonds.

            On the first night of the bus tour, we heard from a fascinating and inspirational speaker, Flonzie Brown Wright, who told us a number of stories about her past. She shared her attempts to register to vote and her later successful campaign to win elected office, supervising the Registrar of Voters. During the march from Selma to Montgomery in the summer of 1965, she received a call from Martin Luther King, Jr., asking her to feed and house the marchers as they passed. With no time to waste, she mobilized her neighbors, utilized every available pair of hands, every nook and cranny in the town, and managed to provide for thousands of marchers. It’s hard to imagine this level of community engagement, unity, and mobilization in today’s fractured times—and it offers a powerful opportunity to reflect on whether we’ve lost some of that spirit of community even as we continually encounter new methods of “connecting.”

            Along with courage and community, the Civil Rights Bus Tour caused me to reflect on the theme of continuity—how the civil rights movement and the events we learned about on the bus tour are connected to all of our lives and experiences to this day. I saw this in a couple of ways, first by contemplating the role of allies to the movement. I was especially struck to learn about James Reeb, a White Unitarian Universalist preacher who joined the marchers in Selma, where he was beaten and killed by segregationists. James Reeb came to Selma from the same city where I live today, Boston. Hearing his story, I felt surprised that I hadn’t heard anything about him before the trip—but also proud to know that he had joined the march for a cause he believed in. His example made me think about how I can be an ally to movements for justice, especially those that are taking place far away from my own lived experiences.

            Finally, the trip helped me reflect on how struggles for justice have impacted every part of the country, including my own. Boston has certainly faced—and continues to face—significant challenges with racial inequity, particularly during the 1970s when protests over busing led to violence and simmering racial tensions. Coming out of this trip, I’m interested in thinking about how we can engage our Policy Fellows in discussions about the history of the struggle for equal rights in Massachusetts. We must not ignore challenges or accept the status quo in our own communities by focusing on problems elsewhere.

            Throughout the tour (which took place at the end of November 2016), it was impossible not to contemplate the impact of the recent presidential election, given the divisive and nasty rhetoric that emerged during that campaign. It made clear that the issues we were discussing are not just in the past, but that ignorance and fear of others persists in very real ways to this day, all across our country. The Civil Rights Bus Tour emphasized to me that there are no bystanders in the movement for equality and justice, but that this is all of our fight, and it continues to this day. It’s possible for all of us to seek the courage to participate, play our part in community efforts for justice, and recognize the continuity with what’s gone on before.

            I’ll close by sharing the inspirational words from the tombstone of James Chaney, one of the three young activists killed in Philadelphia, Mississippi in the summer of 1964: “There are those who are alive yet who will never live. There are those who are dead yet who will live forever. Great deeds inspire and encourage the living.” Participating in the Civil Rights bus tour to learn about Mr. Chaney and others like him was truly an honor and an inspiration, and I hope everyone has the chance to participate in this experience.

Tags:  alumni  civil rights  equity 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 
Page 1 of 2
1  |  2
Contact Us at 4301 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 100 | Washington, DC 20008 | 202-822-8405 | epfp@iel.org

Membership Management Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal